Saturday, December 16, 2006

Fabrizio Plessi Virtual Gallery



Eventually Fabrizio Plessi has an online gallery of his "most interesting" works.

Sunday, December 10, 2006

Mapping Jungian Archetypes on Cognitive Processes

"John Beebe (1, 2) is a genius!" is a thought I had during the last months each time I pondered about Beebe's idea of mapping Jungian Archetypes on Cognitive Processes.

What follows is my very own summary of his proposed model to map Cognitive Processes on Jungian Archetypes that he explained in detail in a four day workshop (Big thanks to Type Resources for organizing this).

You may want to first read John Beebe's introduction to his model.

There are probably people out there who are more knowledgeable than me to write a summary, but there isn't much published yet, so I hope to make a start.

Besides John Beebe, there are quite some people I feel thankful to for sharing their thoughts with me which in one way or another influenced my summary (but who won't necessarily agree with all I am writing): Linda V. Berens (Please write more on Cognitive Dynamics!), Dario Nardi, Vicky Jo Warner, Robin Wiley.

UPDATE, as people found it confusing: A quote is referring to what someone with the function in that role might say.

UPDATE II: These notes are now also available as mind map.

EN (Extraverted Intuition)

Hero:Remarkable inferences
Father/Mother:Opportunity in tragedy
Puer/Puella Aeternus:Take things up for a while: Kanasta, Mahjong
Anima/Animus:"I am usually very opinionated when I see new information by comparing it to prior experience. At one point, however, I am open to new ideas, although I find this difficult."
Opposing Personality:Punching holes in proposals
Witch/Senex:"I accept it, but please shut up!"
Trickster:"Are you single? Yes, I am but really not."
  • Stellan SkarsgĂ„rd in "Breaking the Waves"
  • Demon/Daemon:"What's new about that idea? It's not going to help anything."


    IT (Introverted Thinking)

    Hero:Intellectual clarity
    Father/Mother:Explaining to others using a reasoning process, naming for others
    Puer/Puella Aeternus:Collecting wise quotes; being pedantic at times.
    Anima/Animus:"As much as I want harmony with others, at times I need to make a tough decision."
    Opposing Personality:"Of course you can think everything through until death"
    Witch/Senex:"Principles are not a sufficient means to describe things."
  • Movie: Meryl Streep in "The Devil Wears Prada"
  • Trickster:Deliberately misunderstanding a point
    Demon/Daemon:Messy principles


    EF (Extraverted Feeling)

  • Book: "Lectures on Jung's Typology": The Feeling Function by James Hillman

  • Hero:Harmony, subconscious knowing
    Father/Mother:Being asked by others, censoring oneself
    Puer/Puella Aeternus:Divine affection; easily hurt
    Anima/Animus:"As my logical statements do appear harsh at times, I need to reassure others of my affection."
  • Movie: Cary Grant in "Notorious"
  • Opposing Personality:chit-chat: exhausting, game
  • Cordelia in the very first scene of "King Lear"
  • Witch/Senex:"come to my house so I can eat you" (Hensel&Gretel)
    Trickster:"Let me assist you to make us both feel uncomfortable"
  • Movie: Heath Ledger in "Brokeback Mountain"
  • Demon/Daemon:Disregarding other peoples feelings, being manipulative
  • Movie: Linda Fiorentino in "The Last Seduction"


  • IS (Introverted Sensing)

    Hero:Memento, Recognition of the natural order of things
    Father/Mother:Remembering things for others
    Puer/Puella Aeternus:Collecting memorabilia; can be wearisome.
    Anima/Animus:"Constantly having new ideas may turn things into a chaos, so at times I need to get things in order again."
    Opposing Personality:"Don't bother me with all that detailed information that's not relevant to what's happening now."
    Witch/Senex:Remembering something that really pokes you.
    Trickster:Recall inaccurately: "Didn't we agree that ...?"
    Demon/Daemon:forgetting peoples names, unorderliness, hallucinations, Others ask:"Have you been in this body for long?"
  • Movie: "The Lady Vanishes"


  • IN (Introverted Intiuition)

    Hero:Vision, one line image, demanding, regarded scary
    Father/Mother:There are other ways to do things for others
    Puer/Puella Aeternus:Imagining what could be a trend next year, sometimes hopeless about the future
    Anima/Animus:"After considering all the facts, I eventually realize what it's about."
    Opposing Personality:"There have to be alternative futures"
    Witch/Senex:Deflate dreams
    Trickster:"That's just superstition!"
    Demon/Daemon:This idea is trying to ruin us very badly; God speaks to us


    ET (Extraverted Thinking)

    Hero:Telling others what to do that really helps
  • movie: Katharine Hepburn in "African Queen"
  • Father/Mother:Generative thinking for others
    Puer/Puella Aeternus:Enjoying diagrams, sometimes confusing objectivity with being blunt
    Anima/Animus:"I am able to establish rules or make plans to achieve what I consider as important."
    Opposing Personality:"This is a cheap shot, not well thought through."
  • Albert Brooks in "Broadcast News"
  • Witch/Senex:Rebel against structure and schedules.
    Trickster:Misguidance in organizing things more efficient.
    Demon/Daemon:Having a hard time to tell others bad news.


    IF (Introverted Feeling)

  • Book: "Lectures on Jung's Typology": The Feeling Function by James Hillman
  • Hero:Self-supervising, understand in depth ourself, others
    Father/Mother:Charisma, hearing secrets, "I wish you had told me sooner"
    Puer/Puella Aeternus:Listeing to music, writing poetry, sometimes stating strong value judgements
    Anima/Animus:"Telling others what to do may appear bullying at times but actually I have a soft core of important values."
  • Humphrey Bogart in "Casablanca"
  • Opposing Personality:"Moral questions keep bugging me"
    Witch/Senex:"How are moral question going to help ME anyway?"
    Trickster:"As this discussion has now arrived at a point of no return, why shouldn't I do now what you regarded important earlier?"
    Demon/Daemon:"Manipulating others goes against everything that I am"; neglecting fundamental values; not valuing your health
  • Albert Brooks v William Hurt in "Broadcast News"


  • ES (Extraverted Sensing)

    Hero:Seeing opportunities for action in the here and now
    Father/Mother:Meticulously doing things for others
    Puer/Puella Aeternus:Enjoying activity, sometimes overworking
    Anima/Animus:"It's very easy for me to get a detailed vision by considering just some tiny bits of information, but at times I need to check whether all my assumptions are actually true in reality."
    Opposing Personality:"I am not really good at doing two things at the same time"
    Witch/Senex:Blocking others' proposed actions
    Trickster:Repeatedly dressing up badly for a job interview
    Demon/Daemon:"Things magically break in my presense."
    "I happen to ignore the facts and rely on my interpretation of things."
  • Movie:Thomas Jay Ryan in "Henry Fool"
  • Beebe Archetypes

    My summary of the Archetypes (along with references to books) as used by Dr. John Beebe, based on the workshop "Dynamics of Type" which was held in Memphis in June 2006 (Kindly organized by Type Resources).

    Archetypes are patterns of human behavior that appear when they are required.

    UPDATE: These notes are now also available as mind map.

    Hero

    - Unconscious competence
    - moneymaking

    Mother/Father

    - Helping others, not easy to use for oneself
    - movie: Marianne Sägebrecht in "Bagdad Cafe"

    Puer/Puella Aeternus

    - Inflating, deflating
    - Never grows out
    - Pure
    - book: "Puer Aeternus" by Marie-Louise von Franz

    Anima/Animus

    - Inferiority Complex
    - black hole
    - Bridge to the unconscious
    - blackmail, creative, giving power
    - libido
    - puer is much more primitive
    - movies: Hitchcock's "Vertigo", Miike's "Odishon"
    - Book: "Lectures on Jung's Typology": The Inferior Function by Marie-Louise von Franz

    Opposing Personality

    - Hensel & Gretel: Not enough food -> send them off to starve
    - self sabotage

    Witch/Senex

    - Effect on others: control the behavior of other people
    - anxious -> itchy - witchy
    - "I wish this idea would just go away!"
    - critical, in your gut

    Trickster

    - Double-binds, crude
    - Puts its nose at the collective

    Demon/Daemon

    - Least domesticated
    - Least preferred process
    - nightmare

    Tuesday, December 05, 2006

    R-Sig Finance Mailing List

    Good to see that there are other people doing what I am doing: R-Sig Finance Mailing List.

    Friday, November 24, 2006

    Imagining the Tenth Dimension

    For all of those of you who might have had difficulties of imagining more than three dimensions, there is an animated explanation (uses flash). (You have to click below the helix to the right to enter the area where you can select the animations.)

    Tuesday, November 21, 2006

    Berlin Ranks 23rd in British University Debating Rankings

    After 9 events, my old debating society ranks 23rdin this year's British University Debating season. Patrick and Daniel (with whom I used to debate in a team in Britain) are very successful this year, I am very proud of them!

    Oh, and a debating team unknown to me from Cologne (from Tilbury House) has won the renowned Oxford IV ESL Final--congratulations to them as well! It's the first time a German team has won that competition.

    Programming and Philosophy


    I just noted how many of the methods in Java's Date class are about to expire.

    Sunday, October 01, 2006

    “We must embrace nuclear power to solve global warming”

    A thought-provoking debate (audio) hosted by The Economist on nuclear power as an answer to global warming.

    Monday, September 25, 2006

    The Economist Podcast

    It's quite interesting to hear the voices of the authors of The Economist's articles and fortunately their podcast seems to be updated now more regularly.

    C G Jung Documentary

    I found a wonderful documentary exploring C G Jung's work on the meaning of dreams: 1, 2, 3.

    Enjoy!

    Sunday, September 10, 2006

    Dario Nardi on Socialbot

    When I met Dario Nardi earlier this year he told me he prepared a video for Frontiers of Interaction II on socialbot as he couldn't be there in person.

    Now some kind soul has uploaded his talk on youtube (Part 1, Part 2).

    AFAIU socialbot is a little like Eliza but not aiming at being a therapist, rather than that it imitates cognitive behavior by showing aspects of memory, inference and animated gestures; and it uses speech recognition as well. When used in a seminar with students interaction sessions get logged and are used as a harness to further development of socialbot's behavior.

    Saturday, September 09, 2006

    JavaScript Memoization and Dependencies

    I've extended Oliver Steele's appealing implementation of memoization in JavaScript to use a different dependency mechanism which also works with complex variables such as arrays or hashes by introducing a dependencies callback that returns a string or other simple datatype.

    Function.prototype.memoize = function(options) {
    var fn = this
    var cache = []
    return function() {
    var dependencyFlags = options.dependencies.apply(this, arguments)
    var cacheHit = cache && cache[0] == dependencyFlags
    if (cacheHit) {
    return cache[1]
    }
    cache = [dependencyFlags, fn.apply(this, arguments)]
    return cache[1]
    }
    }

    Here is some code that shows how memoize() can be used to specify dependencies both on function arguments and global variables.

    var sortOrder = 0;
    getSortedModel = function(user) {
    // ... some lenghty calculation
    alert("Performing Lengthy Calculation for " + user)
    return [1, 2, 3, 4]
    }.memoize({ dependencies: function(user) { return user + ":" + sortOrder }})


    Take a look here if you're not familiar with the concept of Memoization.

    (Thanks to Stephan for mentioning Oliver's post.)

    Friday, September 08, 2006

    A Dedication to "King Lear"

    O bridal world of sunshine dreams
    colour me brutish
    wicked eyes
    violently in lust
    trifle life
    God's horror hath a place
    in the bluntness of
    a serpent-like man

    Cordelia,
    our mildness
    once, strong
    is thy prison
    of eyeless love

    Thursday, August 31, 2006

    Random Sampling from a Search Engine's Index

    A highly interesting talk by Ziv Bar-Yossef on how to benchmark search engines, i.e for comparing the size of their indexes. Also includes a very interesting discussion on how to implement a Monte Carlo simulation.

    Sunday, July 23, 2006

    ...

    Everything in the universe can fit into this blog entry.

    Sunday, July 16, 2006

    Prediction of the Future: Intelligent Life

    2063-05-13, Madrid, 10:14 local time

    Leading worldwide scientists report they have unravelled one of humankind's greatest mysteries, the question about intelligent life in the Universe. What people fascinates most: They discovered it on earth!

    Sunday, July 09, 2006

    This is the Title of this Posting

    This is the first sentence of this posting. This is the second sentence which is absolutely unnecessary and adds no interesting information at all. This sentence is solely intended to increase tension and expectation in the reader's mind -- a concept borrowed from Greek tragedy. This sentence introduces a link to an interesting story written in a style similar to this posting, which the author wishes to recommend for reading: This Is the Title of This Story, Which Is Also Found Several Times in the Story Itself.

    This is the last sentence of this posting and pays attribution to A. D. Barncord.

    Wednesday, July 05, 2006

    Memes, an Ethical Problem?

    Could it be unethical to destroy a Meme because it is wrong?

    Saturday, June 17, 2006

    New Tufte Book: Beautiful Evidence

    It has been announced to be published for quite some years so I am delighted Beautiful Evidence is out now eventually. [Via lemonodor.]

    Saturday, May 20, 2006

    Nice Talk about Three Cool Features in Common Lisp

    Peter Seibel gave a nice overview over three cool features in Common Lisp: multiple dispatch, conditions, and macros.

    Wednesday, May 17, 2006

    Replacing Layout Tables with Divs

    A great tutorial that explains how to make a page layout without using tables:
    http://www.alistapart.com/articles/holygrail.

    Sunday, May 07, 2006

    Today's Internet Companies are becoming more like Countries

    Since Internet companies today become more and more social and by that more entrenched in our society, it's becoming more significant what values a company does stand for. Some may now think for example of Google's infamous "don't be evil" motto. However, the problem with it's motto is actually how one does define evil! In principle there are two models when approaching values: Universalism and Relativism. Universalism says all values are the same everywhere and Relativism says they are relative to the cultural context. With Yahoo and Google being currently under public strutiny regarding their behavior in China because they helped to identify a human rights activist (Yahoo) or because they filter search results in accordance with the Chinese government (Google) it becomes clear that these companies have a relativistic stand on values. This is the case with most internationally active companies as it's the one that goes perfectly well with making profits in foreign countries. Nevertheless, even traditional multinational companies today ask themselves about Corporate Social Responsibility, and even though CSR usually is just hot air, the need to stand for a certain sets of values becomes the more necessary the more a company is becoming a part of everyday life.

    A country, and many of you will agree, is not a company. Even though it's structure is similar for one. A country usually has people, it has a culture, it has a law, and a language. And, as most countries, it has signed the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and thereby officially acknowledging that it stands for a Universal set of values (although some countries don't stick to it). A traditional company needs employees and profits to survive. Today's Internet companies also need users, because users/people are the commodity of the Internet age. However, broadening the definition of what a company needs also means to include culture and some aspects of law into the company. And then at this point it becomes obvious that sticking to a relativistic set of values is not enough any more. And I believe that today's Internet companies will have to make a commitment to a Universal set of values in the future.

    Tuesday, May 02, 2006

    Yay Google Tech Talks!

    As Ovidiu Predescu noted a while ago there are tech talks available on Google Video which used to be internal to Google. There are a lot of interesting topics covered, many of which I haven't thought much of before, like: Biofuels, Drug Discovery with OpenSource, Hacking the brain, A new Bill of Rights and Clustering Aggregation. Thanks to Google and Ovidiu!

    Wednesday, April 26, 2006

    The WTO and the Kyoto Protocol

    I wonder whether members of the WTO could make a case at the WTO Court in reference to GATT Article XX which exempts from certain obligations if "necessary to protect human, animal, or plant life and health" in order to pressure USA, China, and India to sign the Kyoto protocol. Especially since today scientific evidence is mounting that greenhouse emissions are responsible for climate change and those three countries together are the biggest producers of greenhouse gases.

    Saturday, April 22, 2006

    Develop better Web Applications with Tamper Data

    I really like firefox's Tamper Data plugin. It let's you edit your browser's HTTP requests before they get sent to the server. You may also replay requests.


    Sunday, April 16, 2006

    My favorite Principles from Yes Minister

    Sir Humphrey's system for stalling a minister's policy proposal, called Creative Inertia



    Stage One: Administration is in its early months and there is an awful lot of other things to get on with.

    Stage Two: I quite appreciate the intention, it certainly ought to be done - but is this the right way to achieve it?

    Stage Three: This is not the time, for all sorts of reasons.

    Stage Four: The policy has run into difficulties - technical, political and/or legal.

    Stage Five: We're getting rather near to the run-up to the next general election - so we can't be sure of getting the policy
    through.


    Government procedure for suppressing unwanted reports


    Stage One: The public interest:

    1) You hint at security considerations.

    2) You point out that the report could be used to put unwelcome pressure on government because it might be misinterpreted.

    3) You then say it is better to wait for the results of a wider and more detailed survey over a longer time-scale.

    4) If there is no such survey being carried out, so much the better. You commission one, which gives you even more time to play with.

    Stage Two: Discredit the evidence that you are not publishing

    You do it indirectly, by press leaks. You say:

      (a) it leaves important questions unanswered
      (b) much of the evidence is inconclusive
      (c) the figures are open to other interpretations
      (d) certain findings are contradictory
      (e) some of the main conclusions have been questioned


    Points (a) to (d) are bound to be true. In fact, all of these criticisms can be made of a report without even reading it. There are, for instance, always some questions unanswered - such as the ones they haven't asked. As regards (e), if some of the main conclusions have not been questioned, question them! Then they have.

    Stage Three: Undermine the recommendation

    This is easily done, with an assortment of governmental phrases:

      (a) 'not really a basis for long-term decisions ...'
      (b) 'not sufficient information on which to base a valid assessment...'
      (c) 'no reason for any fundamental rethink of existing policy...'
      (d) 'broadly speaking, it endorses current practice...'


    These phrases give comfort to people who have not read the report and who don't want change - i.e. almost anybody.

    Stage Four: If stage three still leaves doubts, then Discredit the Man Who Produced the Report

    This must be done OFF THE RECORD. You explain that:

      (a) he is harbouring a grudge against the government
      (b) he is a publicity seeker
      (c) he's trying to get his knighthood
      (d) he's trying to get his chair
      (e) he's trying to get his Vice-Chancellorship
      (f) he used to be a consultant to a multinational company or
      (g) he wants to be a consultant to a multinational company



    The five standard excuses of the Civil Service


    1. The Anthony Blunt excuse

    There is a perfectly satisfactory explanation for everything, but security prevents its disclosure.

    2. The Comprehensive Schools excuse

    It's only gone wrong because of heavy cuts in staff and budget which have stretched supervisory resources beyond the limit.

    3. The Concorde excuse

    It was a worthwhile experiment now abandoned, but not before it provided much valuable data and considerable employment

    4. The Munich Agreement excuse

    It occurred before important facts were known, and cannot happen again. (The important facts in question were that Hitler wanted to conquer Europe. This was actually known; but not to the Foreign Office, of course)

    5. The Charge of the Light Brigade excuse

    It was an unfortunate lapse by an individual which has now been dealt with under internal disciplinary procedures.

    Monday, April 03, 2006

    The future of the dollar

    This article from 2004 by The Economist analyzes the economic influences on the dollar very well.

    Thanks to Stephan Schmidt for his recommendation!

    Fascinating Atoms

    From ``A Short History of Nearly Everything'' by Bill Bryson:


    Atoms are very abundant. They are also fantastically durable. Because they are so long-lived, atoms really get around. Every atom you possess has almost certainly passed through several starts and been part of millions of organisms on its way to becoming you. We are so atomically numerous and so vigorously recycled at death that a significant number of our atoms - up to a billion for each of us, it has been suggested - probably once belonged to Shakespeare. A billion more each came from Buddha and Genghis Khan and Beethoven, and any other historical figure you care to name. (The personages have to be historical, apparently, as it takes the atoms some decades to become throughly redistributed; however much you may wish it, you are not yet one with Elvis Presley.)

    So we are all reincarnations - though short-lived ones. When we die, our atoms will disassemble and move off to find new uses elsewhere - as part of a leaf or other human being or drop of dew. Atoms themselved, however, go on pratically for ever. Nobody actually knows how long an atom can survive, but according to Martin Rees it is probably about 10^35 years - a number - a number so big that even I am happy to express it in mathematical notation.

    Saturday, April 01, 2006

    Interview with Hugo de Garis

    Find it here (Thanks to Eugen Leitl for setting it up!)
    De Garis gives his views on the future of AI, the Artilect, Cosmics vs. Terrans, building artificial brains.

    Monday, March 27, 2006

    Views on the Meaning of Life

    God's Debris: Scott Adams' socratic dialogue. Interesting ideas on the Big Bang, explaining gravity, and probability.

    An interview with Freeman Dyson who argues there is not only a consciousness in human beings - but also on quantum level and in the Universe.